Member Login


Forgot Password?

Interested in joining?



News

Search Options ►

Custom Submission Reminder

Rules



Please be advised that unless you can provide a valid crystal check link, all pets will be judged and processed by current crystal check standards.

This has always been the case, but I've had an increasing number of rejections and resubmission of grandfathered pets, and wanted to nudge this back into memory as it not only helps me, but helps you get your customs back faster.


I would also like to remind everyone that linking previously created pets - especially those with no origin field - is not considered as proof of a design's eligibility to be made due to situations such as the December queue push.

Thank you for your time =)

Posted by Eve (#2775) on Sun May 24, 2015 8:17pm

Comments: 21


Mostly gone (#58780)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:19pm

oh good I was wondering what to do cause there was one you refused that I was told is blue by the creator and saw many of it's type pop up wiht blue crystals

AremRae (#3998)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:26pm

I'm a little confused because even under Gray we were able to get "witnesses" aka people saying I submitted this pet with X maker. And if we had a few people that confirmed the same ruling, we could still submit pets the same? Skitty -strongly- encouraged passing pets directly through the queue to bypass the slower crystal check thread, so a lot of the times rulings were made because of that.

Aethubryn (#13018)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:31pm

So, everyone needs to bother the original artists of designs for a screenshot of their CC page? That doesn't seem right...

AremRae (#3998)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:31pm

If the December pass through is the only issue, pets that are from that date range could have to be counted through the new system but not older pets? I have a lot of pets with rights that I passed through the queue to get a check on, rather than the crystal check thread because of Skitty's urging. I would be very disappointed if all of those rulings were now invalidated...

Aethubryn (#13018)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:33pm

Er, link I mean - but still, if you make a lot of designs and this is the case, it will get annoying to be constantly bothered for your CC link :/

Kozmotis (#48993)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:38pm

Eveglori (#2775) - As irritating and tedious as this process is, I want to say THANK YOU for bringing this to the front of everyone's mind again. That and thank you for taking on the task of custom approval and crystal check! We love you Eve and you're doing a great job

🌊 SeaCrest (#55939)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:39pm

Aethubryn (#13018)

Not unless it's a ruling that could swing either way, I think. Nothing's been changed, she's just reminding us that if you have a design that you specifically got crystal checked and -might- be considered a different percentage under a different custom admin that you should probably link to the crystal check. Like, if I had a design that was confirmed for blue at 49% via the crystal check, but Eveglori's check comes out as 51%, then a link to the original check would still let me submit it as blue. At least, I think that's what she's saying.

Erithan - super busy (#49253)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 8:44pm

Eveglori (#2775)

Curious what should we do about rule clarifications that we may think might be getting confused with what gray considered certain things? I know there has been some confusion on some finer detail type rules that could be interpreted differently.@@

Kanein (#49712)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 9:04pm

<-- waiting on crystal check on some pets since halloween 2014...
If the psd i get has no confirm ruling I sub it to check so i know what to grab but it dose take a very long time to get a ruling back.

Ive found just popping a custom in to que & waiting for a accept or bump is 99% faster. Is prolly why most people just sub & wait instead of checking.

slothful (#64472)

Posted on: Sun May 24, 2015 9:11pm

SeaCrest (#55939)

I was thinking this pertained to designs and lines that were crystal checked upon their PSDs being sold or when it was uploaded into the freebie base thingy... Then the crystal check would have been made public knowledge and you'd be told you need xyz custom maker to get this pet.

And why would people get something crystal checked when someone else already did such? They'd probably assume the artist or psd seller would have put up a correct one as there should be no such thing as a incorrect crystal check, yeah?. So I don't think many submitters would have crystal check link as they never did the crystal check themselves.. so they'd have to contact whoever did the crystal check.. so I get how Aethubryn is concerned about people consistently (or oftenly? not a word but w/e) pestering people who sell base psd and/or arists of base psds that they need proof of for their own submissions of the certain lines.

At least that is how I saw Aethubryn (#13018) 's concern... Because I was thinking myself how that could get crazy... and annoying... and personally, I'd feel extremely bad / guilty for pestering someone about a cc link.. especially if it is for a popular not all that limited base.. pestering isn't something that can be avoided unless you have the funds to spare for the higher grade custom maker >_>... so yeah, that could call for a lot of people annoying them... might even lead to people discontinuing bases they might have not planned on doing such to if things get bad enough. Or at least, I'm not gonna lie, if things got bad I would discontinue the sources of the problem ^^;

I know I wrote a lot.. but I'm kinda confused by the whole thing and I'm generally clueless about custom stuff sooo.... I'm just guesstimating using how I perceived this notice... I very well might have misunderstood it myself ^^; (and it is hard to word things well and concisely when you are not entirely 100% sure what you are talking about, heheh ^^;)